It is not enough to have pages of concrete facts and pages of abstract concepts

Scrapbox can be fun if you consciously write two types of pages

concrete fact

abstract concept

Existing technical terms

Appropriate sentences that make it easy to recall the content

Because it is easy to generate unexpected links of "concrete -> abstract -> concrete" and "abstract -> concrete -> abstract" by 2-hop links.

Use it as an "engine for generating new knowledge links" rather than a "warehouse of dead texts."

But the important point is not "there are pages of concrete facts and pages of abstract concepts".

Common behavior patterns

Create pages for specific book A, book B, and book C = pages of specific facts

Tag each page as "book" = abstract concept page.

This is a poor idea in terms of "creating serendipity."

For example, when I'm looking at a page of an economics book, I'm not happy to see a suggestion for a linguistics book because it's a book.

Why is it that this pattern is not good even though "create and link concrete and abstract pages" is satisfactory?

The title of the abstract page is a tasteless "book"

The concept of an abstract page doesn't sound particularly interesting.

Are you really interested in the concept of "books"?

Are you really going to look at that page in the future?

Too abstract of an abstract concept.

Pattern on the right side of [Do not classify.

Abstract concept page is not recognized as a "page" and is thought of as a tag, so it is an empty page

How to make the abstract concept page "good" is important, but what that "good" is has not yet been verbalized.

---